Founder & Builder

Muhammad
Tayyab

PhD · Industrial Engineering · Founder of Minto

I spent years optimising supply chains for large-scale enterprises — studying why processes break down, where time is lost, and what makes teams consistently fail to follow through. The answer, almost every time, was the same: the meeting ended, and nobody remembered what was agreed.

PhD Industrial Engineering 8 Yrs Supply Chain Building in public
Join Minto waitlist → Email me directly
The story

From supply chains
to software.

My career started in industrial engineering — the discipline that obsesses over eliminating waste, reducing friction, and making systems perform exactly as designed. I applied this to global supply chains: complex, multi-stakeholder operations where a single miscommunication could cost millions.

After years working across logistics, procurement, and operations optimisation, I earned my PhD in Industrial Engineering — a process that sharpened how I think about systems, inefficiency, and why well-designed processes still break down in practice.

The research kept pointing to the same root cause. It wasn't strategy. It wasn't motivation. It was the gap between the meeting room and the task management system. Action items were lost in email threads, forgotten in notebook margins, or misremembered by the wrong people.

I started building Minto because I got tired of watching the same failure repeat itself — in boardrooms, in engineering teams, in startup standups. The technology to fix it existed. Nobody had made it invisible enough to actually use.

"The problem was never the meeting. It was the 47 minutes after the meeting when nothing got written down properly."
— Muhammad Tayyab, Founder

Today I work at the intersection of AI, process engineering, and product design — bringing the same systematic thinking that optimised physical supply chains to the broken workflows inside modern teams.

Today I channel that same engineering mindset into software — building systems that are reliable, invisible, and designed to work exactly as intended, without requiring people to change how they already work.

Background

Education &
experience.

🎓
PhD — Industrial Engineering
Industrial Engineering
Doctoral research in Industrial Engineering — developing deep expertise in systems thinking, process design, and understanding why complex operations fail to perform as intended.
🔗
Supply Chain Management
8 years enterprise experience
Designed and optimised supply chains for large organisations across procurement, logistics, inventory management, and vendor coordination — managing complexity at scale.
Software & AI Development
Full-stack product builder
Building production software across Next.js, Python, embedded C, and AI APIs. Previously built inventory management systems, haptic feedback tools, and automation pipelines.
2026 — Present
Founder — Minto
Building the meeting intelligence platform that turns Gemini and Zoom notes into ClickUp tasks automatically. Designing the full stack: architecture, product, marketing.
8 Years
Supply Chain Management — Enterprise
Led supply chain optimisation projects across procurement, vendor management, logistics coordination, and operational efficiency improvement for large-scale organisations.
Academic
PhD — Industrial Engineering
Doctoral research in Industrial Engineering — building expertise in systems design, operational efficiency, and understanding how complex processes break down at scale.
PhD
Industrial
Engineering
8
Years supply chain
experience
2
Active research
collaborations
1
Mission: fix how
teams execute
The problem

Pain points I lived
every day.

01
Action items vanished after every meeting
Eight years of coordinating suppliers, logistics partners, and internal teams. Every meeting ended with clear decisions — and within 48 hours, half of those decisions were either forgotten, misremembered, or sitting unassigned in someone's notebook.
02
Tasks assigned to the wrong person
In complex supply chain operations, accountability is everything. But when action items were written down manually after the fact, they routinely ended up assigned to the wrong person — or to nobody at all. The result was finger-pointing, delays, and missed deadlines.
03
Follow-ups never happened
The real cost wasn't the meeting itself — it was the follow-up that never came. Without a system that automatically pushed tasks into the tools people already used, the accountability loop never closed. The same issues kept resurfacing in the next meeting.
Why Minto

Three reasons I'm
building this.

01
I lived the problem for years
Running supply chain operations means coordinating dozens of people across time zones. I watched action items disappear after every meeting — not because people were careless, but because the tooling made it too hard to capture them properly and too easy to forget.
02
The academic lens changes everything
A PhD trains you to ask "why does this keep happening?" not just "how do I fix this one instance?" Minto isn't built on hunches — it's built on a systematic understanding of where team execution breaks down and exactly which intervention fixes it permanently.
03
The technology is finally ready
Three things converged in 2025: AI that can genuinely understand meeting language, APIs that make integration trivial, and tools like Gemini that automatically summarise every meeting. The missing piece was someone to connect them invisibly. That's Minto.
Get in touch

Let's talk.

I'm always happy to talk about supply chain, process engineering, AI, or what we're building at Minto. If you're a startup founder who loses action items after meetings — I especially want to hear from you.

Email
tayyab@minto.team
in
LinkedIn
muhammad-tayyab
𝕏
X / Twitter
@tayyab_builds
Join Minto
Get early access